Peer Review Process
Peer Review Process
Scientific Quality & Credibility Standards
Edu Global: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam operates a rigorous Double-Blind Peer Review system. Every submitted paper undergoes objective evaluation by two or more expert reviewers to assess academic suitability, methodology, and original contribution, ensuring the highest scientific quality and credibility.
STAGE 1 Initial Submission & Screening
Submission of Paper
Authors submit via OJS platform. Real-time tracking is available through the journal management system.
Editorial Assessment
Check for scope alignment, formatting, and rigorous similarity check/plagiarism screening using professional software.
Editor-in-Chief Appraisal
Evaluation of originality and scientific relevance. Manuscripts not meeting core standards may be rejected at this stage.
STAGE 2 Double-Blind Review Phase
Invitation to Reviewers
Experts are invited anonymously. Absolute impartiality is maintained via strict double-blind protocols.
Response to Invitations
Reviewers accept or decline based on expertise and availability, or suggest alternate qualified reviewers.
Conducting the Review
Detailed point-by-point evaluation. Recommendations: Accept, Reject, or Request Major/Minor Revisions.
STAGE 3 Final Decision & Publication
Journal Evaluation
Editors evaluate returned reviews. An additional reviewer may be invited if reviewers' opinions differ significantly.
Decision Communication
Official decision along with anonymous reviewer comments are dispatched to the corresponding author.
Final Steps & Publication
Accepted papers proceed to professional copy-editing, layouting, DOI assignment, and immediate open-access publication.
Post-Acceptance Process
Authors are expected to carefully address and integrate revisions according to reviewer and editor instructions. Once the Section Editor and Editor-in-Chief are fully satisfied with the revised manuscript, it is officially scheduled for publication.
